• Users Online: 392
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 76-86

Overview of national strategies on noncommunicable disease and adolescent health in South-East Asia Region countries


1 Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
2 Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health Unit, WHO/SEARO, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication12-Oct-2016

Correspondence Address:
J S Thakur
Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh - 160 012
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2468-8827.191989

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Research shows that risk factors for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are associated with behaviors that either begin or are reinforced during adolescence. Yet, focus on this age group in national NCDs policies globally or regionally in South-East Asia Region (SEAR) has not been adequately addressed. This overview of strategies to prevent NCDs among adolescents in SEAR countries provides a benchmark against which policy response can be assessed and strengthened. We reviewed all publically available documented strategies issued by governments in the 11 SEAR member countries of the World Health Organization on NCDs, published between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2015. NCDs are currently a policy priority in many of the countries with school-based campaigns on healthy lifestyles; alcohol and tobacco-free environment and public ban on advertisements glamorizing unhealthy food among others. However, major challenges such as lack of specific focus on adolescents, lack of recognition of all major risk factors in national policies/programs, weak surveillance, unavailability of age disintegrated data, inefficient program management, low community awareness, and absence of multistakeholder policies persist. Of the countries reviewed, only 54.5% (6/11) proposed a policy that addressed all four of the main NCD risk factors - alcohol and tobacco use, physical inactivity, and obesity. This review demonstrates the disconnection between NCDs, adolescent health, and national policies.

Keywords: Adolescent health, noncommunicable diseases, World Health Organization South-East Asia Region countries


How to cite this article:
Thakur J S, Raina N, Karna P, Singh P, Jeet G, Jaswal N. Overview of national strategies on noncommunicable disease and adolescent health in South-East Asia Region countries. Int J Non-Commun Dis 2016;1:76-86

How to cite this URL:
Thakur J S, Raina N, Karna P, Singh P, Jeet G, Jaswal N. Overview of national strategies on noncommunicable disease and adolescent health in South-East Asia Region countries. Int J Non-Commun Dis [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Jul 15];1:76-86. Available from: http://www.ijncd.org/text.asp?2016/1/2/76/191989


  Introduction Top


Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) accounted for 38 million people deaths of the 56 million deaths (68%) in 2012, of which more than 40% (16 million) were untimely and preventable. [1] Over half of these deaths are associated with behaviors that begin or are reinforced during adolescence. [2] Adolescent health is the outcome of interactions which occur in the prenatal and early childhood periods. [3] Specific biological, physical, and psychological changes along with puberty molded by social determinants of health determine the impact of risky and protective factors that ultimately affect health-related behaviors in adolescents. [4] Global trends indicate that NCD-related risk factors are on rise among young people, and they establish patterns of behaviors that persist throughout life and are often hard to change. [2] The World Health Organization (WHO) defines adolescents as the population in the second decade of life - 10-19 years. [3] We have the epidemiological evidence establishing the linkages between inappropriate fetal nutrition, risky adolescent behavior patterns leading to adult incidence of chronic diseases, reiterating that risk factors persist through the life course, especially for adolescent girls. If adolescents are healthy, they can adequately use their skills and energy to become responsible citizens and contribute optimally socially, economically, and politically. [2] To accomplish this and interrupt the intergenerational cycle of NCDs, national strategies and political will focusing on adolescent health are imperative.

During 2011-2025, the expected cumulative economic losses due to the burden of NCDs under the current scenario in low- and middle-income countries like those in South-East Asia Region (SEAR) according to the WHO is estimated at US$ 7 trillion, and the annual cost of implementing a set of high-impact interventions to reduce the NCD burden worldwide is only US$ 11.2 billion. [1] There are 1.2 billion adolescents (243 million of which are in India alone), which is 18% of the global population; this clearly suggests that targeting adolescents to prevent NCD is indeed a smart and necessary investment. [1] Keeping these in mind, in 2013, the World Health Assembly adopted a comprehensive global monitoring framework with 25 indicators and 9 voluntary global targets for 2025 under the Global NCD Monitoring Framework of which 6 indicators are directly related to adolescents. [5] This review assesses current strategies and identifies gaps needed for strengthening adolescent health services as a part of comprehensive approaches for prevention and control of NCDs. To achieve the global NCD targets, governments and international partners along with the WHO will need to work together, sharing and exchanging evidence and information, and taking necessary steps for reducing gaps in resources and capacity.


  Methods Top


The review on the status of NCD strategies and associated parameters addressing adolescent health was undertaken in 11 countries of the WHO-South-East Asia Region, namely, Bangladesh, Bhutan, DPR Korea, India, Indonesia, Maldives, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Timor-Leste, and Thailand. We searched the Internet using key words ("Adolescents" OR "Adolescence" OR "Youth" OR "Adolescent health" OR "NCD" OR "Chronic diseases" OR "Lifestyle Disease" OR "Physical inactivity" OR "Obesity" OR "Tobacco control" OR "Alcohol" OR "Smoking" OR "Nutrition" OR "NCD") AND ("Policy" OR "Strategies" OR "Actions" OR "Guidelines" OR "Programme") for all publicly available English national policies related to diet nutrition, NCDs, alcohol, tobacco, physical activity, and health. The search was limited to the 11 countries. We searched open access websites of national ministries involved in nutrition or NCD prevention (i.e., ministries of health, public health, sports, welfare, social affairs, education, or agriculture) and government portals. For those countries for where no public document was available or retrieved through the web search, an e-mail request with the study objective was sent to the respective governing body. A similar e-mail request was also sent to the WHO Regional Office and to one to two experts from each of the countries based on personal contacts and author affiliations. For those countries that we were unable to get information either through the web search or formal request, for that particular policy, we listed the country as 'unable to assess related policies'. In addition to our online search, we used the policy database of the WHO MindBank to assess policy availability. Regional WHO publications were also included. The following inclusion criteria were used to catalog the policies/strategic/action plan/program/guidelines in the analysis:

  1. Is from a SEAR country
  2. Is officially approved by the national government
  3. Is a publicly available document, published between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2015, and
  4. Relates directly or indirectly to prevention of NCDs among adolescents
  5. For the purpose of the present review, we used a broad definition for strategy such as "plan," "policy," "standard," "guidelines," and or "program," and all national documents that included the national objectives action on diet and/or physical activity and/or alcohol and/or tobacco and/or adolescent health and/or prevention of NCDs were included.



  Results Top


Through our search, we found that policies or policy-related public documents for our topic were inconsistently available for all countries contrary to what has been mentioned in global reports. In comparison to the WHO reports, we were unable to assess the availability of policy documents of all countries. We found that direct policies for adolescents were available on each of the four domains that we examined sporadically:

  • All 11 countries that had policies on alcohol use directly related to adolescents, especially on ban on consumption of alcohol in educational institutes and to minors
  • Of the 8 countries that had direct policies on physical activity, but all had an advocacy or adolescent health promotion component
  • Only 2 countries in SEAR have not ratified the WHO-Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) on tobacco control
  • Strategies on food/nutrition, overweight, and obesity were very varied with reference to adolescents with no clear national level policy directly addressing obesity.


Policies and provisions that protect adolescents from these harmful factors must be at core of national programs if we were to adequately address them. The findings are summarized in [Table 1].
Table 1: Summary of key strategies against selected noncommunicable diseases risk factors among adolescents in 11 World Health Organization South-East Asia Region countries

Click here to view


Alcohol use

The harmful use of alcohol results in millions of deaths every year including young lives lost. It is not only a direct causal factor for diseases but also more dangerously acts as a precursor to injury and violence. Despite all having some form of ban/restriction on access to alcohol; only four countries: Bhutan, [6] Indonesia, [7] Sri Lanka, [7] and Thailand [8] have adopted a written policy on alcohol. All countries under SEAR have some policy for formulating, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating the use of alcoholic beverages. Countries such as Bangladesh [9] and Maldives [10] have a total ban on sale, advertisement, promotion, and sponsorship of alcohol. Sri Lanka has a unique model of training primary health-care workers to prevent adolescents/youth to initiate alcohol use and screen and refer alcohol-dependent individuals to counselors. [7] Thailand [11] has proposed to implement pictorial health warnings on manufactured or imported alcohol beverages. Timor-Leste [7],[12] is the only country with no ban of any means of advertisement on alcoholic beverages.

The common strategies to reduce the harmful use of alcohol are:

  • Regulating marketing (on television, radio, print media, cinema, billboards, on point of sale, internet, or social media) of alcoholic beverages, for example, advertising alcoholic beverages is banned in India as per the Cable Television Network (Regulation) Amendment Bill effective September 8, 2000 [13]
  • Making educational institutes alcohol free
  • Restricting availability of alcohol to adolescents by prohibition of sale of alcohol to minors (minimum 18 years) in Bhutan, [6] whereas the legal age for drinking in Myanmar, [7] Nepal, [14] Sri Lanka, [7] and Indonesia [7] is 21 years
  • India being diverse has state-specific legislative policies on sale and service related to alcohol [13]
  • Reducing demand through taxation and pricing mechanisms
  • Raising awareness on harmful health impacts caused by the use of alcohol among adolescents, parents, and teachers
  • Providing accessible and affordable counseling and treatment for alcohol-use disorders, and implementing screening and brief interventions programs for hazardous and harmful drinking in health services.


Recognizing the rising public health burden of disease and injury-related alcohol use among its people, the SEAR member countries adopted resolution SEA/RC54/R2, in 2001, to enhance the development of national policies and programs on Mental Health and Substance Abuse including Alcohol. Two policy documents associated with the same came out of the WHO in 2004 on the global evaluation of alcohol consumption patterns and national alcohol control policies that contained information from countries of the Region. [3],[11] In May 2005, the 58 th World Health Assembly reviewed the global situation and adopted a resolution WHA58.26 which covered the public health problems caused by harmful use of alcohol. [11]

Physical activity

The national policies/guidelines/action plan on physical activity which enumerates examples of moderate and vigorous-intensity aerobic and muscle- and bone-strengthening activities for children, adolescents, and young people is not available in almost all countries. Awareness on benefits of regular physical activity through school curriculum is the main strategy around promoting physical activity in policies in the SEAR. Adolescents' education and sensitization through comprehensive life skills-based education on improving health and well-being, provision of safe, and supportive environment for adolescents promote a practice of physical activity in institutes are other common strategies adopted by majority of the countries. Countries such as Bangladesh, [3] Bhutan, [15] DPR, [16] India, [17] Maldives, [10],[18] Myanmar, [7] Sri Lanka, [19] and Timor-Leste [12] targeted educational institutions as well as communities to address the burden of physical inactivity among adolescents, others, such as Indonesia [20] and Thailand [21] targeted the community. Some specific references to more specific nongovernmental policy/strategy related to physical activity in SEAR were:

  • SEANET-NCD (SEAR Network for NCD Prevention and Control) was set up in October 2005: Currently, the network has been formalized, and the regional plan for implementation has been finalized for ministry review in SEAR countries
  • National implementation workshops for ministries for NCD and adolescent health policy development was held in India and Nepal; Sri Lanka to hold a workshop soon. Indonesia is also developing a Plan of Action on the same
  • Community-based Intervention Projects in Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand.


Strategies such as physical education in curriculum, availability of a playground, 20-30 min of physical activity period, and awareness activities for parents were the main health promotion strategies planned by countries at school level. Only one country, Maldives, [10] proposed national policy targets for physical activity. Two countries' policy documents Bangladesh ang [3] Bhutan, [15] contained detailed actions and elaborated an implementation plan for multiple stakeholders. The need to develop satisfactory sports infrastructure and urban planning (e.g. bicycle lanes and recreational centers) was featured in policy documents of Bangladesh, [3] Bhutan, [15] Maldives, [10] and Timor-Leste. [12] While all countries plan to work on physical activity through government sector, India documented explicit actions around involving the private sector in the promotion of physical activity [22] which is implemented through small projects and advertisements.

Overweight/obesity

According to the WHO, people body mass indexes (BMIs) of 25.0 kg/m 2 to 29.9  kg/m 2 are overweight, and BMIs of 30.0 kg/m 2 and more are considered as obese. [23] Worldwide, obesity has nearly doubled since 1980, many low- and middle-income countries like those in SEAR are now facing a "double burden" of disease, whereas they continue to deal with the problems of infectious disease and under-nutrition, and they are experiencing a rapid upsurge in NCD risk factors such as obesity and overweight, particularly in urban settings and among adolescents. [2] National nutrition programs in all SEAR countries have historically focused mainly on the problem of undernutrition. However, over the last decade, countries have introduced strategies to address the risk of over nutrition and unhealthy lifestyle, with strategies targeting the general public and consumers via public education and awareness creation. There was, however, no clear pattern of insufficient physical activity among schoolgoing adolescents across income groups in SEAR countries. [23]

The use of dietary guidelines and food labeling were specifically mentioned as means of public education. The objective of increasing fruit and vegetable consumption was also addressed through school and public education and demonstrations to the same. Thailand [23] was one country which proposed research on problems associated with obesity at individual level, for example, growth, development, and potential occurrence of disease and at population and society level, for example, economic and social loss. Thailand [24] also mentioned specific national fat intake targets. School gardening was another strategy by Bhutan [25] to promote healthy eating habits among children and adolescents. Bangladesh [26] proposed the development of special diet books in this regard. Other strategies, as found in Sri Lanka, [19] for instance, targeted the catering services in educational and government institutions to ensure strict inclusion of fruits and vegetables in the meals. Policy measures outlining responsibilities for the private sector were less frequently encountered than those detailing actions to be implemented by the government or targeting the general public. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013, North Korea has the world's lowest prevalence of overweight and obesity among boys and girls (age <20 years) at 1.0%. [27]

Most of the work on regulating the marketing of food and nonalcoholic beverages in SEAR countries is under process. Only one country Thailand [21] has policy to regulate commercialization of unhealthy food. These policies which are in place in other developed countries regulate advertising and marketing of junk food, limiting the advertisement periods of foods for children from television prime times for children and family, and ban on sale of toys with foods for children. There is evidence that illustrates potential benefits for, for example, a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax could help mitigate the rise in obesity and Type 2 diabetes rates in India among both urban and rural populations, according to a study published by Sanjay Basu et al. "It estimated that a 20% SSB tax across India could avert 11.2 million cases of overweight/obesity and 400,000 cases of Type 2 diabetes between 2014 and 2023, based on the current rate of increases in SSB sales, but if SSB sales were to increase more steeply than the current rate, as predicted by drinks industry marketing models, the researchers estimate that the tax would avert 15.8 million cases of overweight/obesity and 600,000 cases of diabetes." [24]

Tobacco

Nearly, 1 million tobacco-related deaths have occurred in the region in the last decade alone, with India and Indonesia are among the top ten tobacco-consuming countries in the world. [28] Even though cancers, respiratory diseases, and other similar complications are already major health problems in most member countries of the region, research shows that tobacco use accelerates them. The WHO FCTC is the first legally binding international treaty to reduce harm due to tobacco. [28] All countries, except Indonesia [29] and DPR Korea, have ratified the WHO FCTC and are implementing the various elements of MPOWER, a package of effective tobacco control policies. [28] Tobacco legislation is available in all SEAR countries (except Indonesia). Countries have adopted strategies such as ban on advertisement (except North Korea, Indonesia, and Timor-Leste), cigarette pricing policy, adolescent smoking prevention policy, support for smoking cessation therapy, smoking prohibition in educational institutes and public spaces, career incentives, economic incentives, sale prohibition in and near educational institutes (except Timor-Leste), health warnings on tobacco products, and ban on misleading words like "low tar," "light," "ultra-light," or "mild," [28] Myanmar [30] and Timor-Leste [31] are two countries which have textual health warning on the tobacco products. Countries such as Bangladesh, [3] India [32] Indonesia, [29] Maldives, [18] Nepal, [33] Sri Lanka, [34] and Thailand [35] have both textual as well as pictorial warning on tobacco products package as well as rotated the health warnings on packages. Mandatory quitline number on packaging is provided only by Thailand. Only three countries such as Bhutan, Nepal, and Sri Lanka scored high on compliance score for implementing smoke-free education institute.

No country has adopted a national law or regulation on the sale of e-cigarettes except for few states in India. [28] There is a clear difference in tobacco use in urban and rural context and more poor people in this region use low-cost smoking products such as beds, cheroots, roll-your-own cigarettes, dhumti, chutes, chillums, hookah, pipes, and cigars, whereas more affluent people are using manufactured and refined tobacco that is regulated. [29]


  Discussion Top


With the launch of SDGs in September 2015, a major shift has happened linking adolescent NCDs with universal health coverage. [36] Although actions plans/policies addressing NCD are there, they lack focus on adolescent age group. NCDs among adolescents lack recognition of all major risk factors in national policies/programs, face weak surveillance system which fails to cover the entire adolescent group (10-19 years), unavailability of age disintegrated data, insufficient allocation of funds, limited human resources, and lack of engagement of private sector. [37]

NCDs which cause 70% of premature deaths due to behavior initiated during adolescent period were rather overlooked in this crucial period. [2] From our review, we have found that there are very few policies that directly address NCDs and among them further fewer policies comprehensively plan to tackle NCDs through integrated action on risk factors despite the global commitment to address the burden of NCDs. Our results show that most SEARs are averagely prepared to tackle the rising burden of behavioral risk factors for NCD among adolescent. Another important concern is that national documents are not easily accessible. Additional platforms such as an open-access, global repository of initiatives, and policies at the level of WHO SEAR to address NCDs would be a useful initiative toward shared accountability in the global fight against NCDs an issue that is long overdue. [38] Connecting such a policy database to surveillance data on main NCD risk factors, could enable monitoring and facilitate adequate progress in the coming years. [39]

We found that community participation is mostly ignored; prevention underutilized and underemphasized. Parents and adolescents are often not aware of national programs and provisions on adolescent health. Furthermore, population-based surveillance system and registries covering entire adolescent age group for major NCDs-related risk factors are not present; and no repository of NCD-related data in the present national health system. There is limited research done on various NCD risk factors among adolescents, especially in SEAR.

Legislation that bans promotion of risk factors (e.g., smoking) is enforced, but there are no resources to monitor its compliance; this is partly because of the lack of strong leadership and commitment to lead concerted action involving various stakeholders; national documents lack clear guidance for action plan to address individual risk factors to prevent NCDs in general and among adolescents; ways of adaptabilities to keep pace with changing market technology, knowledge, social, political, and environment conditions are insufficient; strategies give the general importance of the issue of rising burden; however, the burden is not considered in terms of equity or fairness; community support during document development was missing which may lead to community nonacceptance. Priority setting and clear expression on roles of stakeholders are another key issues. There is a lack of implementation because of vague coordination, monitoring, and evaluation guidance makes them somewhat ineffective for actual implementation.

In the present analysis, level of detail and outlining of organization of policy actions to undertake was discouraging. Only a few countries cover description of policy actions and included a budget, implementation plan, time frame, and devolvement of responsibility for strategies to combat specific risk factors in their policies. Various policies reviewed describe strategies and actions for NCD prevention using generic statements such as "development of food-based dietary guidelines" or "establishment of fiscal measures for a healthy diet" or "create awareness of healthy eating lifestyle to control NCDs." Such general statements are not informative, and clear actions with responsible stakeholder need to be outlined in policies to mobilize stakeholders for effective action. [40] However, before engaging with private sector, government agencies should be aware of the need to manage potential conflicts of interest between government and private sector and should try to address these by defining clear roles, responsibilities, and targets to be achieved as a result of their collaboration. [36]

Most strategies encountered in the policies were directed toward government agencies and consumers, and few were targeted at the business community, international agencies, or civil society. The United Nations Political Declaration on NCDs makes a strong call for multistakeholder partnerships to be leveraged for effective prevention of NCDs. [41],[42],[43] Parents are potential stakeholders for adolescent health, and only minority of the countries covers them under their policies.

Studies have shown that habits such as alcohol drinking and eating unhealthy food among adolescents are developed at home. Strategies to increase fruit and vegetable intake are the most common dietary action for NCD prevention due to early uptake of this strategy primarily to address existing micronutrient deficiencies such as Vitamin A deficiency and anemia. [44] Policy measures to achieve better results will require active engagement with a wider range of stakeholders and intersectoral coordination, in particular with education, health, sports, food industry, retail, mass media, film industry, and the catering sector. Most strategies encountered in policy documents focused on consumers and aimed to prevent NCDs through awareness creation, education (i.e., labeling), or changing individuals' behavior. School-based interventions and settings-based approach in health promotion, especially school settings are crucial for effective coverage. The traditional approach to addressing lifestyle changes in individuals has met with very limited success. It is widely accepted that the environmental context drives individual diets and lifestyle [41] and that programs need to incorporate environmental determinants (i.e., the quantity, quality, or price of healthy choices, or the built environment for physical activity, or legislatives measures such as ban on alcohol, tobacco, high-calorie drink, or enforcing tax) to be effective. Such policy measures, in particular, those addressing the private sector, were poorly elaborated.

Although an in-depth evaluation of actual implementation, monitoring framework, effects, and resources allocated has not been opportune to date, we hope that our findings provide baseline data and encourage countries to develop monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to assess policy response in due time. National multisectoral action plan for NCDs should clearly address adolescents to have desired results. Overall institutional mechanism should be established with nodal agency to ensure that multisectoral actions of all other departments and ministries related to NCD prevention and control are reported and monitored at regular intervals so that ministries can review and monitor their policies for effectiveness. Documenting the effectiveness of population-based NCD prevention policies, strategies, and activities including school-based interventions will be a critical factor for evidence generation to ensure effective action in SEAR.

Limitations

Although the review tried to capture local or regional activities or initiatives that emerged after the publication of the policies, the major focus was restricted to only national policies. The mere presence or absence of policies or strategies for NCDs in a policy document does not necessarily reflect concrete action in implementation. The findings from a survey in countries with a high burden of NCDs, such as Thailand, illustrate this discrepancy. [39] In addition, it is important to point out that we extracted only actions that explicitly referred to one of the risk factors analyzed.

Moreover, adolescents in the age group of 10-14 years and 15-19 years are quite different and thus have a different need. [4] The policy makers should account for difference in needs of age groups within adolescent age group and equity differentials in the country while developing policies. Countries should have a parenting guide covering two age groups of adolescents. The present review shows that the policy response to address current NCD challenges in SEAR countries is in process. Countries have developed integrated policies that address various risk factors for NCD prevention through multistakeholder collaboration, and intersectoral involvement is yet to be clearly established. Implementation research with clear and prioritized actions is needed to harness the NCD epidemic among adolescent age groups. Documentation of evidence of such actions in policy documents is crucial to promote engagement of stakeholders, and replication of models in the fight against the burden of NCDs in adolescents in most of the countries. The establishment of an open-access and publicly accessible database of adolescent health-related policy documents and actions will be critical in this regard.


  Conclusion Top


High-level commitment is required from all countries to address and reverse the increasing burden of NCDs among adolescents in the region. Key priority for tackling the NCDs in the age group of 10-19 years includes reducing risk factors for NCDs through multisectoral actions; strengthening surveillance system to map the risk, burden, and national responses, promoting life course approach; integrating component of NCDs in ongoing adolescent health programs; integrating strategies on adolescent in National NCD programs, and integrating NCDs into the primary health-care system as a step toward universal health coverage and the same should be covered in every country's policy. The paper can serve as a background document for reviewing, developing, and strengthening adolescent policies and strategies in SEAR countries.

Acknowledgment

Authors acknowledge the technical support provided by the WHO SEARO all technical experts who contributed to completion of the review.

Financial support and sponsorship

The study was supported by WHO SEARO, New Delhi, India.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
World Health Organization. WHO Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
WHO. The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Resnick MD, Catalano RF, Sawyer SM, Viner R, Patton GC. Seizing the opportunities of adolescent health. Lancet 2012;379:1564-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Blum RW, Bastos FI, Kabiru CW, Le LC. Adolescent health in the 21 st century. Lancet 2012;379:1567-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
World Health Organization. WHO Global monitoring framework Draft comprehensive global monitoring framework and targets for the prevention and control of NCDs. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
The Royal Government of Bhutan. The National Policy and Strategic Framework to Reduce Harmful Use of Alcohol 2013-2018. Bhutan; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
World Health Organization. WHO Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Thai Health Promotion Foundation. 60 Outstanding Performances 2001-2009. Bangkok: Thai Health Promotion Foundation; 2012.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Strategic Plan for Surveillance and Prevention of Non Communicable Diseases in Bangladesh 2011-2015. Dhaka: Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Republic of Maldives Ministry of Health. Multi-sectoral Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non communicable Diseases in Maldives (2014-2020). Maldives: Republic of Maldives Ministry of Health; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
WHO. Global Status Report: Alcohol Policy. Geneva: WHO; 2004.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Timor Leste Ministry of Health. Draft National Strategic Plan for School Health 2014-2018; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lalwani S, Dogra TD. Legal aspects of drug abuse in India. In: Lal R, editor. Substance Use Disorder: A Manual for Physicians. New Delhi: National Drug Dependence Treatment Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences; 2005. p. 181-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Dhital R. Alcohol and young people in Nepal. The Globe Special Issue 4. Globe Alcohol Policy Alliance, 2001-2002.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Bhutan Ministry of Health. The Physical Activity Guidelines. Thimpu: Bhutan Ministry of Health; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Democratic People′s Republic of Korea. Ministry of Public Health. Strategic Plan for Prevention and Control of Non communicable Diseases (2011-2015); 2010.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Misra A, Chowbey P, Makkar BM, Vikram NK, Wasir JS, Chadha D, et al. Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management. J Assoc Physicians India 2009;57:163-70.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Republic of Maldives. Ministry of Health and Quality of Life. National Action Plan on Physical Activity 2011-2014; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Government of Sri Lanka. Food Based Dietary guidelines for Sri Lankans. Nutrition Division Ministry of Health; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Indonesia National Development Planning Board. National Action Plan for Food and Nutrition 2006-2010; 2005.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Thai Health Promotion Foundation. Thai Health Annual Report-2009. Bangkok: Thai Health Promotion Foundation, 2010.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Government of India. Planning Commission. Eleventh Five Year Plan: 2007-2012. Social Sector. Vol. II. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 237.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Cheong WS. Overweight and Obesity in Asia. GenRe 2014.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Basu S, Vellakkal S, Agrawal S, Stuckler D, Popkin B, Ebrahim S. Averting obesity and type 2 diabetes in India through sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: An economic-epidemiologic modeling study. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001582.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Bhutan Ministry of Health. National Adolescent Health Strategic Plan 2013-2018. 2013.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Planning Wing, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Health Population and Nutrition Sector Development Program. Operational Plan for "NATIONAL NUTRITION SERVICES" 2011-2016. 2010.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014;384:766-81.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Aditama TY, Pradono J, Rahman K, Warren CW, Jones NR, Asma S, et al. Linking Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) data to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: The case for Indonesia. Prev Med 2008;47 Suppl 1:S11-4.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Myanmar Ministry of Health. Brief Profile on Tobacco Control in Myanmar; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. Health Warning Labels and Tax Control of Manufactured Tobacco Products. 2006.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
McKay AJ, Patel RK, Majeed A. Strategies for tobacco control in India: A systematic review. PLoS One 2015;10:e0122610.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Government of Nepal. Multisectoral Action plan for the Prevention and Control of Non Communicable Diseases: 2014-2020. Nepal; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
De Silva WD, Sinha DN, Kahandawaliyanag A. An assessment of the effectiveness of tobacco control measures on behavior changes related to tobacco use among adolescents and young adults in a district in Sri Lanka. Indian J Cancer 2012;49:438-42.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Thailand. The National Committee for Tobacco Consumption Control. National Strategic Plan 2010-2014.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Sridhar D, Brolan CE, Durrani S, Edge J, Gostin LO, Hill P, et al. Recent shifts in global governance: Implications for the response to non-communicable diseases. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001487.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Frenk J. Strengthening health systems to promote security. Lancet 2009;373:2181-2.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Alleyne G, Horton R, Li L, Lincoln P, et al. UN High-level meeting on non-communicable diseases: Addressing four questions. Lancet 2011;378:449-55.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Alwan A, Maclean DR, Riley LM, d′Espaignet ET, Mathers CD, Stevens GA, et al. Monitoring and surveillance of chronic non-communicable diseases: Progress and capacity in high-burden countries. Lancet 2010;376:1861-8.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F. Dissecting obesogenic environments: The development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med 1999;29 (6 Pt 1):563-70.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
General Assembly of the United Nations. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Palais de Chaillot, Paris; 10 December, 1948. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/">http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/. [Last accessed 2009 Jul 23].  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
General Assembly of the United Nations. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. New York, USA. Available from: http://www. 2.ohchr.org/english/law/cescr.htm. [Last accessed on 1966 Dec 16].  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
World Bank. 1993. World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. New York: Oxford University Press. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5976 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Lachat C, Otchere S, Roberfroid D, Abdulai A, Seret FM, Milesevic J, et al. Diet and physical activity for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic policy review. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001465.  Back to cited text no. 44
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
  Methods
  Results
  Discussion
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2627    
    Printed180    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded94    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]